Reference re Secession of Quebec C. Share on: Facebook Twitter Email Print.
See related content. Requires Const.
Profound changes would be needed. Even if referendum succeeds on clear question, no legal binding secession, but would force gov. This would obligate negotiations on all parties. Issues: What is clear majority and what is clear question?
Would the negotiations be bilateral or multilateral? Does international law give the National Assembly, legislature or government of Quebec the right to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally?
In this regard, is there a right to self-determination under international law that would give the national assembly, legislature or government of Quebec the right to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally? No, but would have to see if Quebec is recognized internationally.
The Time Canada ALMOST Split Into Two (Possibly Three)
In the event of a conflict between domestic and international law on the right of the national assembly, legislature or government of Quebec to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally, which would take precedence in Canada?
No need to answer. Work in symbiosis.
Also desire for continuity and stability. Quebec has been bound to terms in the constitution that it did not sign, such as the new amending formula after and the Canadian Charter.
Flag as Inappropriate. Secession of Quebec. Any types Any type Commentaries Summaries.
Reference re Secession of Quebec
All authors All authors. All publishers All publishers. Filter By. Jurisdiction :.
Cancel Submit. Filter by publisher. Filter by jurisdiction.
Reference Re Secession of Quebec. Newman — The Court Mar 4, Quebec court refuses to stay operation of law banning face cov Hak c.
Quebec Attorney General v. Toronto City v.