An autocratic leadership style is similar to an authoritarian leadership style. Autocratic leaders rely on specific rules, policies, and procedures to govern all processes within the workplace.
To be effective, the leader must be able to have proven competencies in their field, as they are responsible for making most of the decisions in the workplace.
Instead of there being a democratic process for teams, there are no group positions of leadership with the autocratic style. Everything rests with the leader. That means all creative decisions originate from the leader.
Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages to consider with the autocratic leadership style. When there is an autocratic leadership established within an organization, there are fewer levels of administration that must be kept informed of each decision. There is also less feedback from various levels of management which must be processed.
That is because there is one person and they are in charge of all arrangements. This improves the speed of decisions because only one person is weighing the pros and cons of each choice, not a C-Suite.
When there are multiple levels of leadership within an organization, a command from the top becomes like a childhood game of Telephone. Each level of management can inadvertently or purposely put their own spin on the communication come from the leadership. By the time the information reaches the front-line employees doing most of the work, the entire original message could be lost. Autocratic leadership eliminates this issue because the command goes straight to the workers involved.
Because autocratic leaders are able to move information throughout an organization quickly, there are fewer delays in productivity. Workers are less likely to stop their projects or ask for later deadlines because they receive timely decisions and communication from their leadership. That creates a positive impact on the work environment, which leads to more accurate work and consistent production.
Autocratic leaders are able to handle a crisis situation easily because they are the ones who are in charge. If there is a short-term problem, the expertise of the leader can be used to create a solution. For long-term issues, the autocratic leader can direct traffic in specific ways with more efficiency than a C-Suite, creating solutions that can quickly move an organization out of a troublesome state.
Although an autocratic leader can have a challenging personality, most employees prefer to work in an environment where there are clear expectations set for them. At the end of the day, the autocratic leader is like the captain of a ship: every decision is a weight on their shoulders and they are ultimately responsible for what happens.
When this happens, productivity levels tend to decrease over time instead of increase.
Autocratic leaders are in charge and they make this fact known. They get to take all the credit for the work that gets done.
That means workers tend to not take ownership of the work they do because there is no incentive to do so. Over time, this makes employee morale begin to sink. It also creates hardships for the leader because they may get blamed for the actions of a worker when that worker was told to do something completely different.
When an autocratic leader is consistent with their ethics and is determined to create a fair working environment, then there can be a lot of positives for workers in a company. If the leader offers questionable ethics, however, and refuses to create fairness, then there is no one who can really hold that person accountable. The work culture is based solely on the ethics and morality of the leader, which means a poor working environment is not likely to change.
Coaching models for leadership development: An integrative review
Workers are forced to rely on the autocratic leader for all their feedback, instructions, and work duties. If they face a decision in the work they are doing, they are almost forced to go to the leader for advice on what to do instead of making the decision on their own.
That makes it almost impossible for leaders to leave the workplace, as workers can become so dependent on their decision-making abilities that nothing gets done if the leader is not present for some reason.
What leads to a successful working relationship is an ability of workers to have trust in their leaders, and vice-versa. The foundation of the autocratic leadership style is one built on mistrust.
Leaders must assume that their workers are not performing as they should, which requires their direct supervision to ensure results happen.
Autocratic Style leadership | Meaning | Advantages | Disadvantage
These types of interactions do not create a sustainable working relationship, which ultimately creates productivity problems as workers experience lower morale levels. The advantages and disadvantages of the autocratic leadership style show that it can be effective when an organization requires quick, accurate decisions from an experienced leader.
It is an easy way to cut through administrative red tape to ensure better communication to all workers. Over time, however, this leadership style creates mistrust within the workplace.
Workers become dependent on someone else to make decisions.
Autocratic coaching style pdf viewer
That reduces the productivity available, and eventually leads to declining morale. List of the Advantages of Autocratic Leadership 1. It allows for fast decisions to be made. It improves overall communication. It improves productivity. It handles crisis situations effectively.
It reduces employee stress. It counters team inexperience. List of the Disadvantages of Autocratic Leadership 1.
Types of Managers: Autocratic, democratic, laissez faire
It often leads to micromanagement. It does not offer a sense of professional ownership.
Brandon’s Incredible Story
It creates a work culture based on the leader. It creates a system of dependence.
It creates a lack of trust. Share Pin Tweet.